<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Marco Camisani Calzolari</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com</link>
	<description>Strategic Advisor &#124; AI, Cybersecurity &#38; Digital Transformation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 16:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">47191908</site>	<item>
		<title>325 &#8211; Ads Are Coming to ChatGPT, but for How Long Will We See Them as Ads?</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/325-ads-are-coming-to-chatgpt-but-for-how-long-will-we-see-them-as-ads/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 16:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/325-ads-are-coming-to-chatgpt-but-for-how-long-will-we-see-them-as-ads/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ads Are Coming to ChatGPT, but for How Long Will We See Them as Ads?

ChatGPT has ads. Since May 2026 ads.openai.com is open to all US advertisers. Today the ads are visible: a box labeled "Sponsored", under the response. OpenAI keeps repeating the "Answer Independence" principle: ads never influence the answers. Separate systems, architecturally locked. Nice, clean, transparent. How long will it last?

I bet the label will be the first thing to go. Today the box stands out. Tomorrow, when the experience has to be "more conversational", the wording will shrink, more blurred. Already happened with Instagram: sponsored posts used to be obvious at a glance, now it takes two seconds and attention.

The separation between ads and answers is the one I trust the least. OpenAI is aiming for 2.5 billion in ad revenue in 2026 and 100 billion by 2030. IPO coming, infrastructure costing billions a month. And just like on Facebook, when the numbers get that high they even start accepting sponsored scams. When an advertiser pays enough, who decides what the model will suggest about closing your mortgage, switching your doctor, or changing your pills?

Oh, and since April the privacy policy explicitly says OpenAI receives data from advertisers about our purchases…

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months. If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com

📕 The book Artificial Decisions is out now!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0H34WH3BV

🔍 SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpAZovR1kQ0]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2406</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>324 &#8211; The FBI Says AI Is Now a Mass Criminal Tool</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/324-the-fbi-says-ai-is-now-a-mass-criminal-tool/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 16:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/324-the-fbi-says-ai-is-now-a-mass-criminal-tool/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The FBI Says AI Is Now a Mass Criminal Tool

The FBI just released this year's internet crime report, and for the first time in twenty-five years there's a section dedicated to Artificial Intelligence among the crime categories. Which means AI is officially a mass criminal tool.

Recognized AI losses are worth 893 million dollars, almost a billion, and it's an undercount, because we're only counting the people who realized they'd been fooled by a machine. When the scam is done well, the victim stays convinced it was all real.

The elderly are the ones getting hit, because complaints from people over sixty grew 37% in a year and losses grew 59%. They call them with the voice of a grandchild in trouble, while the real grandchild is home and doing just fine.

AI makes industrial what was already there, because before, a scammer worked one person at a time and now works five hundred, each with a different story written by the machine. Corporate emails with wire transfers approved by cloned voices on the phone, fake calls from our bank, romance scams, they always existed, but now they run at enormous scale.

There's one good thing though, because the FBI froze 679 million of the stolen money, and it works if we report right away, in hours and not days.

Suspicion is unfortunately the normal way to be online now, because an email that's too perfect is a warning sign and a familiar voice asking us for money has to be verified outside the channel, calling back the number we already have saved and not the one they called us from.

Share this video to help others too.

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months. If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com

📕 The book Artificial Decisions is out now!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0H34WH3BV

🔍 SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3e9HNZu9gs0]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2403</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>322 &#8211; Hanno comprato il biglietto aereo al robot umanoide</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/322-hanno-comprato-il-biglietto-aereo-al-robot-umanoide/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 16:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/322-hanno-comprato-il-biglietto-aereo-al-robot-umanoide/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They Bought a Plane Ticket for a Humanoid Robot

Maybe as a stunt, maybe because they really do travel around with a robot in tow. Either way, here in the United States someone bought a plane ticket for their robot. A real seat, by the window.

He registered it as Stewie, a humanoid, and it boarded a Southwest flight from Dallas to Las Vegas like any other passenger. They let it on. The next day the airline rewrote the rules. No more human-like or animal-like robots. Not in the cabin, not in the hold. Any size, any purpose.

The real reason is the lithium battery these robots carry inside. The big ones catch fire now and then. The FAA here in the United States has counted 29 cases of smoke, flames or abnormal heat from batteries since the start of 2026 alone.

If you follow me, you know I've made several proposals in institutional settings to regulate humanoid robots. Well, here's one of them, in its own way: no humanoids in the cabin. Now we need what I've been saying for at least two years. A large, clearly visible ID plate, and the obligation to be recognizable as a robot. Because I'm not sure it's clear to everyone, but we're building machines more and more like us. And at some point an airline has to put it in writing that a robot is not a passenger.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months.
If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2399</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>320 &#8211; The Pope&#8217;s Encyclical and Cyberhumanism</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/320-the-popes-encyclical-and-cyberhumanism/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 17:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/320-the-popes-encyclical-and-cyberhumanism/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Pope's Encyclical and Cyberhumanism

For ten years I've been repeating the same things, in companies and in schools and in books: technology is not neutral, Artificial Intelligence seems to understand but it doesn't, whoever has the data has the power.

In Pope Leo XIV's encyclical on AI, Magnifica Humanitas, I found almost word for word the things I've always said. There's blind enthusiasm, where more powerful doesn't mean better. And there's confidence without comprehension, where these systems imitate humans, sometimes beat us on speed, but don't understand what they produce. They simulate empathy, they simulate understanding. They speak well, they're tidy, they seem neutral, but they're not. And meanwhile they get us used to delegating, to taking the ready-made answer and to using our heads less. The Pope seems to have read my book Cyberumanesimo. I did send it to him…

He also writes about the fake relationship that AI creates. For a while now I've been saying that machines today comfort you without existing. And he makes it clear that when speech is simulated it doesn't build a relationship, but only an appearance of one, and the worst risk is losing the desire to truly look for real people.

Then the big theme of whoever has the data has control. I've opened my lectures this way for years, and the encyclical calls the health and demographic data of entire peoples the new rare earths of power. Whoever owns them shapes needs, anticipates markets and decides who gets care and investment before everyone else.

The concentration of power is something I've been calling out forever. The encyclical says AI mainly grows those who already have money, skills and data, and that a few very influential groups steer information, consumption and even democracy. Companies stronger than governments. Today certain decisions are made by a few, the ones who control the data.

Finally it talks about AI and war, a theme anyone who follows me knows is close to me. A machine must not decide over a person's life. The Pope writes that with technology conflict only becomes faster and more impersonal, and the threshold for violence drops. Disarm AI, he says!

In the end the thread is one: stay human. Keep the person at the center and technology at their service. The most institutional voice on the planet, today, is saying what I've been repeating for ten years. You don't need to believe in anything to notice it. And maybe, coming from there, someone is starting to listen.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months.
If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2396</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>319 &#8211; First Robot Maid in America. No Human in the Room, but One Behind It</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/319-first-robot-maid-in-america-no-human-in-the-room-but-one-behind-it/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 16:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/319-first-robot-maid-in-america-no-human-in-the-room-but-one-behind-it/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[First Robot Maid in America. No Human in the Room, but One Behind It

In San Francisco a humanoid robot walked into a regular person's home and cleaned it. They announced it as the first case in the United States. It shows up, works a few hours, leaves. Flat price, $150, big apartment or small. The company is Gatsby. You don't buy the robot, you book it on an app and it arrives, like calling a car at night. Headlines everywhere. The home robot is here.

On its own the robot does the easy stuff: floors, kitchen counters, stovetops and mirrors. The hard stuff, no. A person moves that part, remotely, from a distance. Teleoperation. Someone sitting who knows where, cleaning our home through the robot. And when the robot has a doubt, where do I put this, it texts you and you answer from the couch.

America's first home robot is part autonomous and part a guy with a joystick. Cleaning a messy home alone, for a machine, is still very hard today.

That operator is temporary. He's there to make the robot work while the robot learns. Every cleaned home is data, every correction is training. In five years that operator is gone, and the robot does it all alone. Cleaning is just the start. Underneath there's a platform learning to live in our homes, or in our factories.

For now we pay $150 for a robot that, sometimes, is a man. Soon it'll just be the robot. What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2393</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>321 &#8211; $1,000 a Month to 2,400 Artists. No Strings</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/321-1000-a-month-to-2400-artists-no-strings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 16:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/321-1000-a-month-to-2400-artists-no-strings/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[$1,000 a Month to 2,400 Artists. No Strings

Here in New York they gave 2,400 artists $1,000 a month for eighteen months. No conditions. No obligations. No need to explain anything. $43 million in total, funded mostly by the Mellon Foundation. 22,000 applied. For 2,400 spots.

The same line always comes up on guaranteed income. Give people money and they stop working. They sit down. They wait for the transfer. That's not what happened.

The artists kept working. They changed the kind of work. They dropped the side jobs (the bartender, the shop clerk, the waiter) and went back to what they had actually trained for: painting, writing, playing, teaching art in Brooklyn neighborhoods.

Total income dropped, on average, by $11,600 a year. Almost exactly the amount they were getting from the program. Those $1,000 a month turned into time. Time to make art instead of serving coffee. A painter I know in Bushwick told me that once she stopped chasing the next paycheck, she got back the hours to think about the next painting.

Here in the United States creative work is quietly being hollowed out. Midjourney makes ad images instead of photographers. ChatGPT writes technical copy instead of copywriters. Suno produces music instead of musicians. One job at a time.

Artists are a particular category, driven by reasons that go beyond a paycheck. Guaranteed income doesn't fix everything. But those $1,000 shifted their time onto the work they actually wanted to do. And while machines are eating creative jobs for breakfast, giving people the hours to stay creative is a real possibility. Obviously they have to be truly creative and not just freeloaders, which is a whole other story.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2390</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>318 &#8211; A Man Beat the Humanoid Robots at Sorting Packages</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/318-a-man-beat-the-humanoid-robots-at-sorting-packages/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 16:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/318-a-man-beat-the-humanoid-robots-at-sorting-packages/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Man Beat the Humanoid Robots at Sorting Packages. For Now…

Figure AI, a company that builds intelligent humanoid robots, switched on a livestream on May 13 and turned it off yesterday. 200 hours of work. They put three humanoids sorting packages on a belt, taking turns, no breaks, day and night. The stream ran until one of them broke. That was the goal, to see when they collapse.

In 10 days they sorted 200,000 packages. Three seconds a package, about the same as us. Nobody runs them from outside, they read the camera pixels and decide on their own.

At one point they put them up against a human. Ten hours, man against machine. The human won: 12,924 packages to 12,732. By a hair, but a guy on his own beat them. Except he came out with a forearm nearly broken and his hands covered in blisters. The robot didn't, of course.

And meanwhile there's another thing worth watching. The three robots are called Bob, Frank and Gary, well, it's the viewers in the comments who gave them those names, names the company then printed on a tag. People got attached to one robot or another, ten million views, some watch the stream like a reality show. We humanize whatever resembles us, and soon we'll grow fond of robots. Crazy? Think about the people who love their car and care for it like family, so imagine how this ends with humanoid robots.

And this stream isn't just a toy. Behind it there's Microsoft, Amazon and OpenAI, almost two billion raised, a valuation close to 40 billion. For now it's more of a lab experiment than something ready for a real warehouse, they still mess up putting the packages down. But in 3 years things will look very different, a bit like when an IBM computer beat Kasparov at chess. Before then it seemed impossible it could happen, today we think it's the least a computer can do.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC #AI]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2387</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>317 &#8211; An AI Adds Typos to Our Emails to Make Us Look Human</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/317-an-ai-adds-typos-to-our-emails-to-make-us-look-human/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 16:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/317-an-ai-adds-typos-to-our-emails-to-make-us-look-human/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An AI Adds Typos to Our Emails to Make Us Look Human

We spent years teaching machines to write well. Now we pay another machine to mess up what they wrote.

It's called Sinceerly. And no, it's not misspelled by accident. It's a Chrome plugin that takes your AI-polished email and puts back the typos, the contractions, the broken sentences. So it looks like you wrote it yourself, in a rush, from your phone.

Three modes. The first is Subtle, it strips filler words and drops in a contraction here and there. One typo in the first line, just because. The second is Human, it makes the tone more conversational. Another typo in the first line, obviously. The third is called CEO: all lowercase, very short sentences. If you don't have a signature, it sometimes throws in a "sent from my iPhone." So you sound real. Someone with no time to write properly.

For centuries typos meant "you're careless." Now they mean "I'm real, I wrote it myself." We flipped the meaning of words.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC #AI

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months.
If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2384</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>298 &#8211; CFOs Are Discovering AI Costs More Than the People They Fired</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/298-cfos-are-discovering-ai-costs-more-than-the-people-they-fired/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/298-cfos-are-discovering-ai-costs-more-than-the-people-they-fired/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CFOs Are Discovering AI Costs More Than the People They Fired

CFOs are discovering an embarrassing problem. AI tokens cost more than the salaries of the people they fired to put AI in their place. Here in the States a well-known investor said it out loud: 300 dollars a day for a single AI agent, that's 100,000 dollars a year. And that agent was running at 10 or 20% of what a human would do.

When does the cost of tokens overtake the salary of the employee? Boardrooms, meetings and work dinners here in New York keep asking the same question. We're already past that line. Other founders I talk to say the same thing: an AI agent has to be at least twice as productive as a human to pay for itself, otherwise the cash burns out.

Per-token prices have collapsed, total bills have exploded. 73% of companies blow through their AI budget. Average budgets jumped from 1.2 million to 7 million dollars in two years. Some Fortune 500 firms pay tens of millions a month just in inference.

In 2026 around 500,000 layoffs in the US are attributed to AI, nine times last year. But over 80% of those same companies admit AI hasn't yet produced measurable productivity gains. Many firms are blaming AI for layoffs that have nothing to do with AI. They call it AI washing. Do you remember greenwashing?

CFOs are starting to see the numbers on the screen. And they're starting to understand. What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months.
If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2379</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>296 &#8211; Meta Helps Parents Talk to Their Kids About AI</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/296-meta-helps-parents-talk-to-their-kids-about-ai/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/296-meta-helps-parents-talk-to-their-kids-about-ai/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Meta Helps Parents Talk to Their Kids About AI

Almost no parent I know has any idea what their kids actually do with AI. Homework? Small talk? Stuff they wouldn't tell anyone else? Meta figured it out. Or maybe they figured out it was getting expensive in court (last month they lost a child safety case in the US, 375 million dollars). Either way, they shipped something useful, and we must say it.

Parents supervising teen accounts on Facebook, Instagram and Messenger now see a new "Insights" tab. They don't read the messages. They see the topics their kids discussed with Meta AI over the last seven days. School, travel, entertainment, health, wellbeing. Tap on "health" and you get fitness, physical health, mental health. If your teenage daughter is talking to a chatbot about mental health, it's probably time you talked too.

Knowing isn't enough. You need a way to open the conversation without the kid shutting down. Meta worked with the Cyberbullying Research Center on eleven questions. They're well done. No lecturing, no interrogation.

"What's the most useful thing AI has helped you with?" You start from the positive, because kids assume by default that the adult wants to scold them.

"Have you ever asked AI something because it was easier than asking a real person?" This is the most important one. You're telling your kid they can come to you even for the awkward stuff.

The "Insights" have a big hole though. They say "mental health" but don't tell you if your kid is looking up breathing exercises or something much worse. The real alerts, the ones on self-harm, Meta is still developing.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months.
If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2376</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>287 &#8211; Newspapers and TV News Won&#8217;t Tell You This!</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/287-newspapers-and-tv-news-wont-tell-you-this/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 16:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/287-newspapers-and-tv-news-wont-tell-you-this/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Newspapers and TV News Won't Tell You This!

Sounds like clickbait, but you know me. If I'm writing something like this, there's a serious problem. They should be talking about it every single day, TV news and newspapers. There's a revolution happening and nobody's covering it. And it's coming like a tsunami.

See these people? We're inside an Indian clothing factory and every single worker has a camera on their head. They're training the Artificial Intelligence that will power humanoid robots. Robots that will learn to do exactly what these workers do. Intelligent robots with AI can learn any manual job the same way ChatGPT learned to write anything. ChatGPT and the others copied what we humans wrote for thousands of years. Now robots are copying what we've done for thousands of years. And they'll be just as good at it as AI is already good at writing text and sounding intelligent.

Elon Musk has paused production of some car models to go all in on intelligent humanoid robots.

They'll be in our homes, our restaurants, our bars, our factories. They don't get tired and they never sleep. They go recharge their own batteries. If one breaks, other robots fix it.

A tsunami we need to face. I'm sure there will be a way through, just like there was with previous revolutions. But you see how it's not possible that I'm the only one talking about this constantly, while newspapers and TV news cover society gossip that means absolutely nothing?

The clickbait title. Yes, it grabs clicks. But for a good reason. Share this video with everyone you know.

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC #Robot]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2371</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>284 &#8211; Here&#8217;s an Example of AI Agents in Action</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/284-heres-an-example-of-ai-agents-in-action/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 16:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/284-heres-an-example-of-ai-agents-in-action/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here's an Example of AI Agents in Action That I'm Sure Will Inspire You

A guy who sells pools in Florida took OpenClaw, an open-source AI agent, and programmed it to find homes without a pool and convince homeowners to build one. He wrote the instructions, hit enter and went to sleep.

The agent starts from satellite imagery. It scans lots one by one in the Tampa area, measures the land, checks zoning constraints and decides if there's room for a pool. If the lot qualifies, it keeps going on its own. It generates a rendering: the homeowner's backyard seen from above, with a pool already in it. It calculates the construction cost and how much the home value goes up.

Then it searches public records for the homeowner. Finds the listing agent tied to the property. Prepares a postcard with the aerial rendering and a QR code. Ships it through Lob, an automated print and mail service. Three days later it's in the mailbox. On top of that the AI agent automatically creates a personalized website just for that homeowner, with all the details, reachable from the QR code.

What used to take months of work gets done in one night while the seller sleeps. The agent runs, scans new homes, produces new postcards, mails them out. Every homeowner gets a different message, built on their actual house, with numbers calculated on their lot. One single AI agent doing the job of an entire team: real estate analyst, graphic designer, copywriter, mailing service and salesperson. For a few dozen dollars in API costs.

And it doesn't just work for pools. Same logic applies to solar panels, roofing, fencing, landscaping. Anything visible from above and sellable door to door, without knocking. As I always say, the first to be replaced by AI are those who don't use AI. What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2368</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>273 &#8211; Automation Is the Wrong Word</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/273-automation-is-the-wrong-word/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 16:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/273-automation-is-the-wrong-word/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Automation Is the Wrong Word. AI Doesn't Automate, It Autonomizes

Algorithm, virtual, and automation. Three words we use incorrectly. Three videos, one per word. Today: why we're wrong to use "automation."

Automation means making something automatic. A process that you used to do by hand, now a machine does it. Same steps, same result, every time. A washing machine is automation. A badge gate is automation. An email triggered by a purchase is automation. A happens, B follows. Predefined, repeatable, controllable.

The problem is when we use the same word for Artificial Intelligence. When we ask AI to answer customers, screen résumés, or analyze medical data, we're not automating anything. We're autonomizing. We're telling a system to decide on its own.

The request no longer passes through a predefined sequence. It passes through the model's training, its weights, whatever guardrails someone put in place or didn't. The result isn't predictable. It changes every time. It's an autonomous decision. The difference is enormous, especially when it touches the real world.

If I automate a weapon, I press a button and it fires ten rounds. Always ten. Always when I press. If I autonomize a weapon, the system decides when to fire, at whom, and how many rounds. Based on what it "learned."

If I automate a banking process, the transfer goes when the customer clicks send. If I autonomize it, the system decides whether to approve, block, or flag. And the money is real, as we said in the previous videos. Digital, but absolutely real.

When we say "we automated customer service with AI," we're hiding what actually happened. We gave a system the power to decide on our behalf. That's not automation. That's autonomy. We should say autonomize, so people understand we're talking about systems that make autonomous decisions, that choose, that don't just execute. That's why this series is called Artificial Decisions.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp-1XK8-snA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Utzft_O_b9w

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months.
If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2365</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>271 &#8211; Virtual Is Not the Opposite of Real!</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/271-virtual-is-not-the-opposite-of-real/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 16:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/271-virtual-is-not-the-opposite-of-real/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Virtual Is Not the Opposite of Real! We're Using the Wrong Word, Causing Real Damage

Algorithm, virtual, and automation. Three words we use incorrectly. Three videos, one per word. Today: why we're wrong to use "virtual."

Newspapers keep writing: real world versus virtual world. As if they were two separate places. Completely wrong. Here's how it actually works.

The real world is the big container. Inside it, two spaces: the physical world and the digital world. Physical is where we move, touch, look each other in the face. Digital is where we write, work, buy, argue, fall in love. Two different spaces, but both produce real consequences. Both are real.

If I'm on a video call and we make decisions, those decisions are real. You can't touch them with your hands, but you touch them with the facts. If I buy something online, the money is gone for real. If someone insults me in a chat, it lands, it hurts, it stays. Especially if you are young. None of this is virtual. It's digital. And it's absolutely real.

The virtual world is something else. It sits outside the real world. It uses digital technology as a tool, but produces no effects beyond itself. In a videogame you kill a character, it dies, another respawns. No consequences off-screen.

But we use "virtual" for everything online, and this can cause damage. A kid bullies a classmate in a group chat. Headlines say: "bullying in the virtual world." That word cuts the weight in half. Kids believe it. They think certain things are okay because it's the virtual world. It doesn't count. Except it counts exactly like the physical world, because it's digital, and digital is part of the real world.

Every time we say "virtual" when we should say "digital," we're removing weight from something that carries real weight. What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2362</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>269 &#8211; Algorithm. The Wrong Word for AI</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/269-algorithm-the-wrong-word-for-ai/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/269-algorithm-the-wrong-word-for-ai/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Wrong Word for AI

#Algorithm, virtual, and automation. Three words we use incorrectly, and I'll explain why. I'll make three videos, one for each word. Today: why we're wrong to use "algorithm."

We hear it everywhere. We know what it means: a sequence of instructions. If A happens, do B. Same input, same output. Always. On social media we got it. An algorithm ranks content inside fixed parameters. More likes, higher up. Rules written by someone, verifiable, predictable.

Now people use the same word for Artificial Intelligence. Wrong word. Technically it works. The problem is what the listener hears. "Algorithm" means procedure, calculation, control. Something predictable.

AI runs on training, weights, probabilities. Same question twice, different answer. No formula. A system that estimates, interprets, and decides on its own.

If you think "algorithm," you think the system is under control. You trust it with hiring, patient evaluation, customer service. You don't realize how much autonomy you're handing over. AI doesn't execute like a calculator. It chooses. Every time differently. Nobody can explain exactly why.

With an algorithm you give a task to a machine. With AI you give autonomy to a machine. Completely different things.

When we say "algorithm" for AI, we're reassuring people. We're saying: it's under control, it's predictable. It's not. What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC #AI]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2356</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>268 &#8211; We&#8217;re Hitting Like on Millions of Fake Photos</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/268-were-hitting-like-on-millions-of-fake-photos/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 16:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/268-were-hitting-like-on-millions-of-fake-photos/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We're Hitting Like on Millions of Fake Photos. We Either Stop or the Damage Will Be Irreversible

The AI wedding photos of Zendaya and Tom Holland passed eleven million likes on Instagram. Posted on March 4 by a random creator. Completely generated by Artificial Intelligence. Eleven million people who hit like on an event that never existed. But who notices when the light is perfect and the setting is romantic?

January 2025, California wildfires. Someone generated AI images of the Hollywood Sign engulfed in flames and put them into circulation on X and Instagram. They spread within minutes. Authorities had to publicly announce that the landmark was untouched. Not to correct a news story, to stop the panic.

At the 2024 Met Gala, AI photos of Katy Perry were so convincing that her own mother thought she was there that evening.

We're at this point now. No hacking required, no infiltrating anything. A few seconds and a free tool are enough to put a convincing photo into circulation: a crime that didn't happen, a politician saying things they never said, a person in trouble for something they never did.

And the platforms? Meta cut its fact-checking teams while the problem was exploding. X deliberately lowered filters on Grok for generating images of public figures. OpenAI in 2025 updated GPT-4o's policies to allow the creation of images of politicians and public figures on simple request. The people running these tools know exactly what's happening.

We got used to not believing words. Now we have to learn not to believe images. Nobody prepared us for this.

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2353</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>267 &#8211; Watch Out for Loyalty Cards and Health Insurance!</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/267-watch-out-for-loyalty-cards-and-health-insurance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 17:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/267-watch-out-for-loyalty-cards-and-health-insurance/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Watch Out for Loyalty Cards and Health Insurance!

Every time we use a loyalty card, we leave a very clear trail: what we buy, when we buy it, how often, and in what quantities. Those digital receipts turn into data. That data turns into a profile.

And profiles create inferences. Over-the-counter medicines, gluten-free products, items linked to a medical diet. Over time, these signals can reveal habits and sensitive details about a household.

On the health side, the stakes are even higher. In the US, more processes around claims and approvals involve automation. And the Change Healthcare cyberattack showed how fragile these large health and payment systems can be, affecting a huge number of people.

California launched a public tool called DROP to help people request deletion and opt-out from data brokers. The personal data market is now a major issue.

What does this mean for a family? Shopping habits and health data can contribute to a detailed risk and money profile, not just ads. Use loyalty cards only when the benefit is real. Check the privacy settings of loyalty programs and limit data sharing when possible. For health and insurance, ask what data is collected, how long it's kept, and who it's shared with.

Data doesn't stay still. It moves. And the more detailed it is, the more valuable it becomes to someone else.

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2350</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>266 &#8211; AI Is Frying Our Brains! We&#8217;re Producing More. Thinking Less</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/266-ai-is-frying-our-brains-were-producing-more-thinking-less/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 17:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/266-ai-is-frying-our-brains-were-producing-more-thinking-less/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AI Is Frying Our Brains! We're Producing More. Thinking Less

Researchers interviewed hundreds of full-time American workers and found they're suffering from something new called AI brain fry. Fried brain from Artificial Intelligence!

AI makes individual tasks faster. What used to take three hours now takes 45 minutes. But the days get harder. When each task takes less time, you don't do fewer tasks, you do more. Our apparent capacity expands, the work expands to fill it. Managers see output growing and expectations rise.

Before AI, you'd spend a whole day on one design problem. Sketch on paper, think in the shower, go for a walk, come back with clarity. One problem, one day. Today that one problem becomes six, and each one "only takes an hour with AI." But context-switching six times is brutally expensive for the human brain. AI doesn't get tired between problems. We do.

Before AI, the job was: think, produce, test, ship. You were the creator. After AI, the job became: write a prompt, wait, read output, evaluate it, decide if it's correct, fix what doesn't work, repeat. You became a reviewer, a judge, an inspector on an assembly line that never stops.

People who use AI intensively spend 14% more mental energy at work, accumulate 12% more cognitive fatigue, face 19% more information overload. People in a state of AI brain fry make 33% more decisions while exhausted, make serious errors 39% more often, and are 39% more likely to want to quit. We're burning out the people who use the tools most, the ones companies depend on most.

Use it to free yourself from the useless and you perform better. Use it to do as many things as possible in the least amount of time and you burn out.

Using AI to free up time, then filling that time with more work, isn't productivity. It's running on a treadmill that never stops and it fries our brains. What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2347</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>264 &#8211; The Cloud Doesn&#8217;t Exist</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/264-the-cloud-doesnt-exist/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 17:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/264-the-cloud-doesnt-exist/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Cloud Doesn't Exist

The cloud doesn't exist. There's a warehouse with servers inside, on a specific piece of land, in a specific place in the world. On March 1st, someone was reminded of that.

Iran struck three Amazon data centers. Two in the UAE, one in Bahrain. Banks down, payments frozen, delivery apps offline. Millions of people with no access to anything. This is the first documented military attack on a hyperscale cloud provider, ever.

Data is usually replicated across multiple locations. Amazon's system is designed to survive the loss of one availability zone. Not two. Two zones hit simultaneously, and the system fails. That's exactly what happened.

Think for a moment about how many things you only have online: tools, files, workflows, suppliers, banking systems. Everything on the cloud.

There's another angle almost no one talks about. It has nothing to do with bombs, it's about governments. Your provider guarantees confidentiality, says no one else sees your data. But the provider has a headquarters, it's registered in a country. And that country, in many cases, has legal authority over its data. It can knock on the door and say: give me those files. The company may have signed anything with you, but the state comes first. And often, the state is not required to tell you.

There are countries you'd never want to share your data with. Less friendly countries. And yet your data sits there, in a warehouse, in that country, under that country's laws.

Ask yourself where your data physically is. Not in the cloud. In a building, in a country, with that country's rules on top. What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC #AI]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2344</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>262 &#8211; The War Is Going Cyber and Companies Are the First to Be Attacked</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/262-the-war-is-going-cyber-and-companies-are-the-first-to-be-attacked/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 17:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/262-the-war-is-going-cyber-and-companies-are-the-first-to-be-attacked/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The War Is Going Cyber and Companies Are the First to Be Attacked

Dear companies, you need to protect yourselves. The warnings are strong. Attacks on European companies are increasing, and the situation in the Middle East is accelerating everything. Companies that have nothing to do with Israel or Iran are involved too: companies that manufacture components, manage logistics, provide financial services. Perfect targets, precisely because they feel far from the problem. Attacks don't stop at the borders of the region at war. They expand, hit civilian networks, supply chains, banks in countries that have nothing to do with the conflict. It happened in previous crises and it's happening now.

FortiGuard Labs by Fortinet are currently recording app tampering, intrusions into broadcasters, Telegram posts announcing attacks against critical infrastructure. It's not yet a coordinated campaign. But attackers don't wait for it to become one. Iran historically doesn't respond immediately. It waits for attention to drop. Weeks later, when security teams have let their guard down, it strikes. The silence of these days is not a signal that the risk has passed.

European companies need to invest in ongoing training for their employees. Not a one-time course that gets forgotten. Realistic phishing simulations, regular updates, a security culture that becomes part of daily habits. A prepared employee recognizes a suspicious email before opening it. That's why you need to run events and training continuously. You need to turn your employees into the first line of defense, not the first point of entry.

Alongside training you need basic technical measures: multi-factor authentication on VPNs and remote access, patches on all systems, segmented networks so whoever gets in through one point can't reach everything else, backups isolated from the network, tested, ready to work when you actually need them.

Those who fix these things now will have the advantage. Those who wait for the explosion to start will arrive too late. There's a parallel mechanism that doesn't depend on any state actor. Geopolitical chaos is perfect cover. And the easiest target is not the firewall, it's the person who receives the email. Most attacks come in from there: an employee who clicks on the wrong link, an attachment opened without thinking, a password reused across a personal and a company account. Not out of negligence, out of lack of preparation.

Are you doing this? Is your company doing this?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2341</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
